MGC Blog Calendar

Loading ...

MGC Blog Latest Posts

b2ap3_thumbnail_3560856061_20a83080d0_z.jpg
How many deaths before the SSDI gets updated again?
Legislation Federal
Rate this blog entry:
Please Sign RPAC's Genealogists’ Declaration of Rights
General Legislation
Rate this blog entry:
bostonstatehouse - small lime
We're Taking Genealogy to the State House!
General Legislation
Rate this blog entry:

MGC Blog Tag Cloud

HR 295 HR3475 New Jersey RPAC Instruction NAPHSIS 2012 IGS introduction Michael J. Astrue Advocacy Jan Meisels Allen legislation Ethnicity Oklahoma New Hampshire blog diagnosis Annual Seminar DMF; SSDI; Tax Fraud; legislation land records Harold Henderson HR295 IAJGS State archives APG Advocacy Federal Virginia Rep. Michael Capuano (MA) Richard McCoy sysoon Free Pennsylvania Georgia Archives Melinde Byrne Elections FamilySearch Senate budget IRS FGS Conference RPAC budget cuts Henning Jacobson funding NEHGS Society Showcase 2012 Seminar Rep. Sam Johnson (TX) Linda McCleary Public Records mail forwarding Programs access Randy Seaver Registration Access records access Rep. Richard Nugent (FL) Annual Meeting and Seminar SSA Ancestry HR6205 Thomas MacEntee Stan Nyberg volunteers SSDI Arkansas Georgia fraud family traits S3432 closures Judy Russell Richard Nugent identity fraud Newsletter smallpox legislators HR3475 Virginia SSDI Billie Fogarty public access Bruce Cohen humane 2014 Seminar Alfred DeMaria Transparency Records Access S-1534 David Rencher Jan Alpert award Rhode Island Vital Records medical pedigree Georgia FOIA Jacobson v Massachusetts family medical history Presidential Citation Sharon Sergeant volunteerism threats to access Death Master File Legislative Annual Seminar pensions Social Security Administration Education TIGTA audit archives Lou Szucs DMF Vendors Records Access Donna Holt Siemiatoski open access S1534 State House seminar New Hampshire Civil Records records access State Library outreach Tennessee legislation SSA Sponsors Fred Moss Tax Fraud War of 1812 NERGC Identity Theft health history inheritable disease ISJGS IAJGS Legal Genealogist records access FGS Tennessee DMF medical profile civil records DPH NGS NFOIC Speakers State legislation Alvie Davidson Congress APG Roundtable Massachusetts Congress Kenneth Ryesky Arkansas Presenters Massachusetts Health pedigree communication Delaware Public Records Mary Ellen Grogran Genealogy Kate Auspitz legislation Annual Meeting threats to access FGS online registration Lame Duck Jan Meisels Allen MGC Open Access

Member Login

Affiliations

fgsmemberlogo

fgs ptp donate

MGC Sentinel logo MGC Sentinel Logo

RENEW MGC

MGC Sentinel

Keeping Watch Over Massachusetts Public Records

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

How to Get Discouraged: Only Four States Represented at the RPAC Session at NGS

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 112285
  • 1 Comment
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

At 3:00 pm Thursday afternoon, 10 May 2012, in Cincinnati, Ohio, RPAC met at the National Genealogical Society’s annual convention. On behalf of MGC, I attended as a Massachusetts liaison.

What is RPAC? The Records Preservation and Access Committee is a three-person panel with an advisory board. The three panelists are delegates from the Federation of Genealogical Societies, the National Genealogical Society, and the International Association of Jewish Genealogical Societies. About a dozen people sit as advisors, but the bulk of the work and the bulk of the strategy comes from the three panelists: David Rencher, AG, CG, the Genealogist at FamilySearch in Utah; Fred Moss from Texas; and Jan Meisels Allen from California. Together for many years they have provided advice to state genealogical societies whenever access or preservation issues arise. Last year they supported our efforts to stop a bill that would have closed records back to 1840.

This year has certainly been one of those years in which access is under siege. I hope you’ve read our recent posts about bills before the U.S. Congress to shut off our access to the Social Security Death Index. That access was granted to us by court order under the Freedom of Information Act. The SSDI is the public face of the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File (DMF). Just two days before the RPAC meeting, the House held a committee hearing on the bills. You would think that this active threat to open access would have generated lots of interest and that the room would have been packed. If that is your assumption, you couldn’t be more wrong.

Of the fifty states, only twenty-six have appointed liaisons to RPAC. Of those twenty-six liaisons, three were in the audience and one was remotely logged-in using webinar technology. Four out of twenty-six means that 15% of the liaisons attended in one way or another. Four out of fifty means that only 8% of the states supported the effort. Arizona’s Linda McCleary was logged-in. Nora Galvin attended from Connecticut but is not yet an official liaison. And, while I was delighted to visit and exchange business cards with Alvie Davidson, CG, from Florida and Billie Fogarty from Oklahoma, this is hardly a large enough team to win an access fight.

The first two-thirds of the meeting took the same form I saw at last year’s meeting. David Rencher presented the slide show that RPAC has developed for state liaisons. Then Jan Meisels Allen presented a slide show about how the legislative process works and where we can have an impact on it. Both slide shows should be accessible from the RPAC web site hosted by FGS at www.fgs.org/RPAC.

The meeting ended with Fred Moss passing a microphone around and taking questions. Rather than questions, however, we in the audience wanted to talk strategy. Nora Galvin asked why the SSDI online petition had so few signers. Judy Russell, CG, the Legal Genealogist blogger from New Jersey (and also not an official liaison), spoke about the need to lead our argument with our strongest argument, the importance of the SSDI to forensic researchers. I got a few words in, too, about focusing on the major parts of several bills that have to do with the real issue, tax fraud that government does nothing at all to deter. At that point, the meeting closed a half-hour earlier than scheduled.

Judy Russell’s blog posting at the end of the day said it all, “But the truth is, folks, … winning the records access battles that genealogists face is critical to all of us. We really need to pull together for all of these fights: for the SSDI, for access to vital records and so much more. These battles can’t be won if they’re fought by only a few.”[1]



[1] Judy G. Russell, “NGS 2012 Day Two,” The Legal Genealogist, 12 May 2012; http://legalgenealogist.com/blog/2012/05/11/ngs-2012-day-2/ : viewed 15 May 2012.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
Barbara serves as the Federal Records Director. She is a Board-certified genealogist who works for the Massachusetts Society of the Colonial Dames of America as a Verifying Genealogist and for the Welles Family Association as a Genealogist. Her volunteer service includes a stint as President of MGC. She holds a master’s degree in the management of non-profits from the Florence Heller School at Brandeis University. You can read her own blog, The Demanding Genealogist, at demandinggenealogist.blogspot.com.

Comments

  • Guest
    Paul Silverstone Wednesday, 16 May 2012

    Indifference is the enemy of logic and justice. Indifference allows those with narrow-minded motives to get their way. Our apparent inability to rouse those most affected by closing access needs recruiting some 'names' to our cause. The logic of open access is being overridden by anecdotal evidence. Genealogists are being made the scapegoat for problems caused by computer theft and negligence on the part of large websites run by business and government. Those pushing these bills may manage to close off 1% of identity theft and claim a great victory, when in reality they will have accomplished nothing and only made things worse.

    Reply Cancel

Leave your comment

Guest
Guest Monday, 22 December 2014