Recent Blog Posts

bpl postcard
The Value of Open Public Records
Records and Repositories
Rate this blog entry:
10849762 815727755140585 6825543623968073505 n
MGC's NERGC Panel on Open Records: Citizens Can Make a Difference
General Legislation
Rate this blog entry:
How many deaths before the SSDI gets updated again?
Legislation Federal
Rate this blog entry:

MGC Blog Tag Cloud

Pennsylvania Public Records IRS IGS Advocacy RPAC Registration sysoon Stan Nyberg Education Virginia Jan Meisels Allen 2012 Ancestry Arkansas David Rencher Jan Meisels Allen Identity Theft Linda McCleary Sharon Sergeant SSA Rep. Richard Nugent (FL) Records Access Bruce Cohen DPH outreach Ethnicity family medical history inheritable disease Newsletter S3432 legislation Public Records New Hampshire Civil Records Massachusetts Senate Georgia Archives HR295 Randy Seaver introduction access identity fraud communication Annual Seminar NFOIC FGS Conference State House civil records online registration Open Access Transparency Oklahoma Kate Auspitz mail forwarding Speakers Delaware S1534 Henning Jacobson Presidential Citation Records Access budget cuts public access Thomas MacEntee State legislation Fred Moss State Library budget Tax Fraud IAJGS volunteerism records access pensions New Jersey Tennessee NEHGS APG Roundtable Legal Genealogist Alfred DeMaria RPAC Barbara Mathews Presenters HR6205 FOIA legislation Lou Szucs Federal threats to access New Hampshire diagnosis Judy Russell open access DMF Annual Seminar Massachusetts NERGC 2012 Seminar Jan Alpert family traits records access humane Access seminar Virginia IAJGS Harold Henderson NAPHSIS Donna Holt Siemiatoski Advocacy Rhode Island Alvie Davidson Richard McCoy Social Security Administration TIGTA audit SSDI DMF archives APG fraud Programs award records access HR 295 Jacobson v Massachusetts Genealogy Free funding Elections 2014 Seminar Billie Fogarty Congress State archives Vendors Society Showcase Michael J. Astrue NGS Rep. Sam Johnson (TX) SSDI Rep. Michael Capuano (MA) Georgia blog health history Vital Records Kenneth Ryesky Annual Meeting Helen Shaw DMF; SSDI; Tax Fraud; legislation legislators HR3475 Melinde Byrne Richard Nugent Mary Ellen Grogran Legislative HR3475 legislation Annual Meeting and Seminar ISJGS Teresa Scott medical profile threats to access Health pedigree Instruction Georgia medical pedigree FGS land records SSA FGS Congress MGC Sponsors smallpox War of 1812 FamilySearch Arkansas Death Master File Lame Duck closures S-1534 Tennessee volunteers


(Online donations available
after website update in 2016.)
MGC has been recognized as tax-exempt under Internal Revenue Code 501(c)(3). Gifts of support are fully tax-deductible and donors will receive a written acknowledgement for tax purposes.

MGC Sentinel logo MGC Sentinel Logo

MGC Sentinel

Keeping Watch Over Massachusetts Public Records

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

How to Get Discouraged: Only Four States Represented at the RPAC Session at NGS

Posted by on in Uncategorized
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 127421
  • 1 Comment
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

At 3:00 pm Thursday afternoon, 10 May 2012, in Cincinnati, Ohio, RPAC met at the National Genealogical Society’s annual convention. On behalf of MGC, I attended as a Massachusetts liaison.

What is RPAC? The Records Preservation and Access Committee is a three-person panel with an advisory board. The three panelists are delegates from the Federation of Genealogical Societies, the National Genealogical Society, and the International Association of Jewish Genealogical Societies. About a dozen people sit as advisors, but the bulk of the work and the bulk of the strategy comes from the three panelists: David Rencher, AG, CG, the Genealogist at FamilySearch in Utah; Fred Moss from Texas; and Jan Meisels Allen from California. Together for many years they have provided advice to state genealogical societies whenever access or preservation issues arise. Last year they supported our efforts to stop a bill that would have closed records back to 1840.

This year has certainly been one of those years in which access is under siege. I hope you’ve read our recent posts about bills before the U.S. Congress to shut off our access to the Social Security Death Index. That access was granted to us by court order under the Freedom of Information Act. The SSDI is the public face of the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File (DMF). Just two days before the RPAC meeting, the House held a committee hearing on the bills. You would think that this active threat to open access would have generated lots of interest and that the room would have been packed. If that is your assumption, you couldn’t be more wrong.

Of the fifty states, only twenty-six have appointed liaisons to RPAC. Of those twenty-six liaisons, three were in the audience and one was remotely logged-in using webinar technology. Four out of twenty-six means that 15% of the liaisons attended in one way or another. Four out of fifty means that only 8% of the states supported the effort. Arizona’s Linda McCleary was logged-in. Nora Galvin attended from Connecticut but is not yet an official liaison. And, while I was delighted to visit and exchange business cards with Alvie Davidson, CG, from Florida and Billie Fogarty from Oklahoma, this is hardly a large enough team to win an access fight.

The first two-thirds of the meeting took the same form I saw at last year’s meeting. David Rencher presented the slide show that RPAC has developed for state liaisons. Then Jan Meisels Allen presented a slide show about how the legislative process works and where we can have an impact on it. Both slide shows should be accessible from the RPAC web site hosted by FGS at

The meeting ended with Fred Moss passing a microphone around and taking questions. Rather than questions, however, we in the audience wanted to talk strategy. Nora Galvin asked why the SSDI online petition had so few signers. Judy Russell, CG, the Legal Genealogist blogger from New Jersey (and also not an official liaison), spoke about the need to lead our argument with our strongest argument, the importance of the SSDI to forensic researchers. I got a few words in, too, about focusing on the major parts of several bills that have to do with the real issue, tax fraud that government does nothing at all to deter. At that point, the meeting closed a half-hour earlier than scheduled.

Judy Russell’s blog posting at the end of the day said it all, “But the truth is, folks, … winning the records access battles that genealogists face is critical to all of us. We really need to pull together for all of these fights: for the SSDI, for access to vital records and so much more. These battles can’t be won if they’re fought by only a few.”[1]

[1] Judy G. Russell, “NGS 2012 Day Two,” The Legal Genealogist, 12 May 2012; : viewed 15 May 2012.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:
Barbara serves as the Federal Records Director. She is a Board-certified genealogist who works for the Massachusetts Society of the Colonial Dames of America as a Verifying Genealogist and for the Welles Family Association as a Genealogist. Her volunteer service includes a stint as President of MGC. She holds a master’s degree in the management of non-profits from the Florence Heller School at Brandeis University. You can read her own blog, The Demanding Genealogist, at


  • Guest
    Paul Silverstone Wednesday, 16 May 2012

    Indifference is the enemy of logic and justice. Indifference allows those with narrow-minded motives to get their way. Our apparent inability to rouse those most affected by closing access needs recruiting some 'names' to our cause. The logic of open access is being overridden by anecdotal evidence. Genealogists are being made the scapegoat for problems caused by computer theft and negligence on the part of large websites run by business and government. Those pushing these bills may manage to close off 1% of identity theft and claim a great victory, when in reality they will have accomplished nothing and only made things worse.

    Reply Cancel

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 21 October 2016